Curse

Superb · Mar 06, 2009, 09:36 PM // 21:36

they change recharge to 15 secs.. so is it still possbile to run?

zling · Mar 06, 2009, 09:47 PM // 21:47

very much so, it just cant be maintained 100% of the time now so you need to use it a bit more carefuly.

honestly this nerf is nothing to worry about as any decent Warrior brings a cancel stance to it, usually [rush] so there's no problem at all...

Winterclaw · Mar 06, 2009, 09:51 PM // 21:51

It can be maintained at 15, but you don't want to do that in PvP IMO. Apparently having two slots taken up to use one elite wasn't balanced enough for anet.

**Marty Silverblade** · Mar 06, 2009, 09:56 PM // 21:56

Yeah. Constantly cancelling is discouraged but it's definately still runnable.

moriz · Mar 06, 2009, 09:59 PM // 21:59

at 4 second recharge, it was more powerful than other warrior elites for axe.

personally i believe 15r is too harsh. 12r is long enough. or, 15r with the old 33% IMS.

GourangaPizza · Mar 12, 2009, 01:02 PM // 13:02

^ Agreed
Ever since they reduced its movement speed to 25% I removed it from my bar. Rush + Frenzy is much better than current Primal Rage.

_Nihilist_ · Mar 14, 2009, 02:10 AM // 02:10

It was powerful as all get out with a 33% buff to both IAS and IMS. That was like getting [Frenzy] + [Charge!] on yourself and letting it be perma'd. The reduction to 25% IMS was necessary, but the nerf to 15sec recharge on top of the IMS reduction is a bit much.

Wish Swiftdeath · Mar 14, 2009, 02:28 AM // 02:28

10 would have been fine, you spike him - get 6-7 seconds of respite.

Now primal is recharging more often than it's being used, if you're playing anyone good (which means you can still run in RA).

Rhamia Darigaz · Mar 14, 2009, 03:00 AM // 03:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by zling

very much so, it just cant be maintained 100% of the time now so you need to use it a bit more carefuly.

honestly this nerf is nothing to worry about as any decent Warrior brings a cancel stance to it, usually [rush] so there's no problem at all...

the fact that you need a cancel stance with prage doesn't make the longer recharge irrelevant, i don't even know what line of reasoning brought you to think that. in fact, the need for a cancel stance is the reason the longer recharge is so bad. you used to be able to go right back into prage after cancelling it. now getting linebacked a few seconds after you use prage=10 seconds of no ias.

Bobby2 · Mar 14, 2009, 09:25 AM // 09:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhamia Darigaz

i don't even know what line of reasoning brought you to think that

'Staying alive > killing shit'

Hey, you asked... sort of